The Depletion Protocol
The Depletion Protocol, was first proposed by Colin Campbell 10 years ago at a
conference in London. It has surfaced in various guises since. Named the
Uppsala Protocol in 2002, on the occasion of the First International ASPO's
Workshop, it has later been also referred to as the Rimini Protocol. It can be
found In: "The Truth about Oil and the Looming Energy Crisis", Colin Campbell
(Eagle Print, Ireland, 2004). Here it is reproduced:
Introduction

It is obvious that the transition to declining oil supply will be a time of
great international tension as consumers vie with each other for access to oil,
and as oil prices soar, when capacity limits are breached. Normal market forces
are ill-adapted to deal with this situation as the high prices represent
profiteering from shortage by oil companies and producing governments as the
cost of production does not rise materially. A strong case can therefore be
made for managing the situation by government intervention through a depletion
protocol.
In outline, such a protocol would require producers to limit production to
their current depletion rate, namely annual production as a percentage of what
remains, which is a small burden insofar than few can exceed this limit anyway.
More important, it would require importers to limit their imports to match
world depletion rate. This would have the effect of moderating world prices so
as to put them in better relationship with actual cost preventing profiteering
and the massive destabilizing financial flows that threaten the financial
system. In humanitarian terms, moderating world prices would allow poor
countries to afford their minimal needs.
The importing countries observing the protocol could manage their obligations
in different ways as suited their environments, having strong incentives to cut
waste, improve efficiency and bring in renewable energies to the extent
possible. The mechanisms could include a combination of basic rationing,
special tax treatment and normal market practices. Importing countries might
decide to licence imports demanding to know the origin of the imports and
imposing the right to audit the reserves of the fields concerned in order to
determine the security of future supply.
If countries were to dedicate efforts to determine what the world depletion
rate was, establishing the appropriate scientific procedures, the need for
action would likely soon become self-evident.
Although desirable, complete compliance by all countries is not essential, as
the countries that did adopt the principles of the Protocol would soon find
themselves at a considerable advantage over those that continued to live in the
past. Detailed negotiations are called for to settle matters of definition and
the treatment of heavy oils and special situations, as well as providing for
the equitable treatment of commercial interests. It might also be possible to
integrate the procedures with current efforts to meet the threat of climate
change attributed to emissions from fossil fuels, including oil and gas. The
time to act is now, before the impact of depletion bites in earnest.
The Protocol

WHEREAS the passage of history has recorded an increasing pace of change, such
that the demand for energy has grown rapidly in parallel with the world
population over the past two hundred years since the Industrial Revolution;
WHEREAS the energy supply required by the population has come mainly from coal
and petroleum, having been formed but rarely in the geological past, such
resources being inevitably subject to depletion;
WHEREAS oil provides ninety percent of transport fuel, essential to trade, and
plays a critical role in agriculture, needed to feed the expanding population;
WHEREAS oil is unevenly distributed on the Planet for well-understood
geological reasons, with much being concentrated in five countries, bordering
the Persian Gulf;
WHEREAS all the major productive provinces of the World have been identified
with the help of advanced technology and growing geological knowledge, it being
now evident that discovery reached a peak in the 1960s, despite technological
progress, and a diligent search;
WHEREAS the past peak of discovery inevitably leads to a corresponding peak in
production during the first decade of the 21st Century, assuming no radical
decline in demand;
WHEREAS the onset of the decline of this critical resource affects all aspects
of modern life, such having grave political and geopolitical implications;
WHEREAS it is expedient to plan an orderly transition to the new World
environment of reduced energy supply, making early provisions to avoid the
waste of energy, stimulate the entry of substitute energies, and extend the
life of the remaining oil;
WHEREAS it is desirable to meet the challenges so arising in a co-operative and
equitable manner, such to address related climate change concerns, economic and
financial stability and the threats of conflicts for access to critical
resources.
Now it is proposed that
1- A convention of nations shall be called to consider the issue with a view to
agreeing an Accord with the following objectives:
a) to avoid profiteering from shortage, such that oil
prices may remain in reasonable relationship with production cost;
b) to allow poor countries to afford their imports;
c) to avoid destabilising financial flows arising from
excessive oil prices;
d) to encourage consumers to avoid waste;
e) to stimulate the development of alternative
energies.
2- Such an Accord shall have the following outline provisions:
a) No country shall produce oil at above its current
Depletion Rate, such being defined as annual production as a percentage of the
estimated amount left to produce;
b) Each importing country shall reduce its imports to
match the current World Depletion Rate, deducting any indigenous production.
3- Detailed provisions shall cover the definition of the several categories of
oil, exemptions and qualifications, and the scientific procedures for the
estimation of Depletion Rate.
4- The signatory countries shall cooperate in providing information on their
reserves, allowing full technical audit, such that the Depletion Rate may be
accurately determined.
5- The signatory countries shall have the right to appeal their assessed
Depletion Rate in the event of changed circumstances.
|